Current:Home > ContactAustralians’ rejection of the Indigenous Voice in constitutional vote is shameful, supporters say -FutureFinance
Australians’ rejection of the Indigenous Voice in constitutional vote is shameful, supporters say
View
Date:2025-04-28 03:38:08
CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — Indigenous campaigners who wanted Australia to create an advisory body representing its most disadvantaged ethnic minority have said its rejection in a constitutional referendum was a “shameful act.”
Many proponents of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament maintained a week of silence and flew Aboriginal flags at half-staff across Australia after the Oct. 14 vote deciding against enshrining such a representative committee in the constitution.
In an open letter to federal lawmakers, dated Sunday and seen by The Associated Press on Monday, “yes” campaigners said the result was “so appalling and mean-spirited as to be utterly unbelievable.”
“The truth is that the majority of Australians have committed a shameful act whether knowingly or not and there is nothing positive to be interpreted from it,” the letter said.
The letter said it was written by Indigenous leaders, community members and organizations but is not signed.
Indigenous leader Sean Gordon said on Monday he was one of the many people who had drafted the letter and had decided against adding their signatures.
“It was a statement that could allow Indigenous people across the country and non-Indigenous people across the country to commit to it and so signing it by individuals or organizations really wasn’t the approach that we took,” Gordon told Australian Broadcasting Corp.
Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles, who heads the government while Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is in the United States, said he accepted the public’s verdict on the Voice.
“The Australian people always get the answer right and the government absolutely accepts the result of the referendum, so we will not be moving forward with constitutional recognition,” Marles told reporters.
The letter writers blamed the result partly on the main opposition parties endorsing a “no” vote.
The writers accused the conversative Liberal Party and Nationals party of choosing to impose “wanton political damage” on the center-left Labor Party government instead of supporting disadvantaged Indigenous people.
No referendum has ever passed in Australia without the bipartisan support of the major parties.
Senior Liberal senator Michaelia Cash said voters had rejected Albanese’s Voice model.
“Australians on referendum day, they did not vote ‘no’ to uniting Indigenous people, they did not vote ‘no’ to better outcomes for our most disadvantaged. What Australians voted ‘no’ to was Mr. Albanese,” Cash said.
The Indigenous writers said social media and mainstream media had “unleashed a tsunami of racism against our people” during the referendum campaign.
The referendum was defeated with 61% of Australians voting “no.”
veryGood! (55)
Related
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Billy Joel back on the road, joining Rod Stewart at Cleveland Browns Stadium concert
- Losing a job in your 50s is extremely tough. Here are 3 steps to take when layoffs happen.
- What you should know if you’re about to fly on a Boeing Max 9
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Washington Wizards move head coach Wes Unseld Jr. to front office advisory role
- 'Feud: Capote vs. The Swans': Who plays Truman Capote and his 'Swans' in new FX series?
- Kansas City Chiefs' Isiah Pacheco runs so hard people say 'You run like you bite people'
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Billy Joel back on the road, joining Rod Stewart at Cleveland Browns Stadium concert
Ranking
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Accused Taylor Swift stalker arrested 3 times in 5 days outside of her NYC home
- 'Squatters' turn Beverly Hills mansion into party hub. But how? The listing agent explains.
- Deputies didn't detain Lewiston shooter despite prior warnings. Sheriff now defends them.
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Former elected official held in Vegas journalist’s killing has new lawyer, wants to go to trial
- New coach Jim Harbaugh will have the Chargers in a Super Bowl sooner than you think
- Teen murder suspect still on the run after fleeing from Philadelphia hospital
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
The 'mob wife' aesthetic is in. But what about the vintage fur that comes with it?
West Virginia GOP majority pushes contentious bills arming teachers, restricting bathrooms, books
Biden unveils nearly $5 billion in new infrastructure projects
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
Dry, sunny San Diego was hit with damaging floods. What's going on? Is it climate change?
Horoscopes Today, January 25, 2024
Vermont State Police investigate the shooting of a woman found dead in a vehicle in St. Johnsbury